Exoscale vs Civo: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Civo is 29% cheaper than Exoscale for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€65 vs €91/mo)
At the cluster level, Civo runs 29% cheaper, roughly €26/mo less than its competitor. Exoscale delivers ~6× the storage IOPS, which matters for write-heavy workloads like etcd or database operators. Civo wins on network egress — unlimited egress vs paid. Choose Civo for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Exoscale for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Exoscale |  Civo | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Switzerland | United Kingdom |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €17.03/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €21.73/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€91.24/mo | ~€65.19/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€142.33/mo | ~€130.38/mo |
| Egress | €0.020/GB | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.020/GB | €0.011/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, FINMA | ISO27001, SOC2 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Exoscale as of May 2026, Civo as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator