Exoscale vs STACKIT: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Exoscale is 17% cheaper than STACKIT for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€91 vs €110/mo)
Exoscale costs 17% less — a saving of ~€19/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. Storage IOPS differ by ~8×, with STACKIT ahead — relevant if your workload relies on persistent volumes. For outbound traffic, STACKIT is more cost-effective: unlimited egress vs paid. Choose Exoscale for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose STACKIT for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Exoscale |  STACKIT | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Switzerland | Germany |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | €74.63/mo |
| Cheapest Node | €17.03/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €11.91/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€91.24/mo | ~€110.36/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€142.33/mo | ~€146.09/mo |
| Egress | €0.020/GB | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.020/GB | €0.006/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, FINMA | ISO27001, ISO27017, ISO27018, C5, SOC2 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Exoscale as of May 2026, STACKIT as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator