IONOS vs Exoscale: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Exoscale is 5% cheaper than IONOS for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€91 vs €96/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 5% (€5/mo) in Exoscale's favour. On storage throughput, IONOS leads by ~9×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Exoscale wins on network egress — €0.020/GB vs €0.050/GB (2.5× cheaper). Choose Exoscale for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose IONOS for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 IONOS |  Exoscale | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Germany | Switzerland |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €32.12/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €17.03/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€96.36/mo | ~€91.24/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€192.72/mo | ~€142.33/mo |
| Egress | €0.050/GB | €0.020/GB |
| S3 Storage | €0.015/GB | €0.020/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001 | ISO27001, FINMA |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: IONOS as of May 2026, Exoscale as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator