Skip to main content

IONOS vs Hetzner: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)

Hetzner is 70% cheaper than IONOS for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€29 vs €96/mo)

The 3-node cost gap is 70% (€68/mo) in Hetzner's favour. On storage throughput, IONOS leads by ~6×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Control plane management differs: IONOS is fully managed; Hetzner is self-operated. Choose Hetzner for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose IONOS for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.

Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?

Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →

Browse EU agencies
DE IONOS
DE Hetzner
HQ / Country Germany Germany
Managed Kubernetes Yes No (DIY)
Control Plane Cost Free Self-managed
Cheapest Node
€32.12/mo
2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM
€4.75/mo
2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM
3-Node Cluster* ~€96.36/mo ~€28.50/mo
6-Node HA Cluster* ~€192.72/mo ~€42.75/mo
Egress €0.050/GB 20 TB free
S3 Storage €0.015/GB €0.010/GB
Certifications ISO27001 ISO27001, C5, PCI-DSS
CLOUD Act Exposure No No

* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.

Data freshness: IONOS as of May 2026, Hetzner as of Feb 2026.

Who Should Use Which?

IONOS offers managed Kubernetes with a free control plane — ideal if you want German data sovereignty without managing the control plane yourself. Hetzner is cheaper per node but requires self-managed K3s/K8s. Choose IONOS for convenience and compliance, Hetzner for raw cost savings.

Calculate Your Exact Cost

Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.

Open Calculator

Open Source Pricing Data

All pricing data is open source and community-maintained

View on GitHub