Civo vs Gcore: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Gcore is 43% cheaper than Civo for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€37 vs €65/mo)
Gcore costs 43% less — a saving of ~€28/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. On storage throughput, Gcore leads by ~11×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Choose Gcore for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Civo for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Civo |  Gcore | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | United Kingdom | Luxembourg |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €21.73/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €12.32/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€65.19/mo | ~€36.96/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€130.38/mo | ~€73.92/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.011/GB | €0.040/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, SOC2 | ISO27001, SOC2, PCI-DSS |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Civo as of May 2026, Gcore as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator