Scaleway vs Civo: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Scaleway is 71% cheaper than Civo for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€19 vs €65/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 71% (€46/mo) in Scaleway's favour. On storage throughput, Scaleway leads by ~18×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. On block storage, Scaleway is the cheaper option at roughly 1/1.4 the price per GB. Choose Scaleway for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Civo for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Scaleway |  Civo | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | France | United Kingdom |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €6.34/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €21.73/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€19.02/mo | ~€65.19/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€38.04/mo | ~€130.38/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.010/GB | €0.011/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, HDS | ISO27001, SOC2 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Scaleway as of May 2026, Civo as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator