Skip to main content

Exoscale vs Verda: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)

Exoscale is 52% cheaper than Verda for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€91 vs €188/mo)

At the cluster level, Exoscale runs 52% cheaper, roughly €97/mo less than its competitor. Storage IOPS differ by ~20×, with Verda ahead — relevant if your workload relies on persistent volumes. Control plane management differs: Exoscale is fully managed; Verda is self-operated. Choose Exoscale for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Verda for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.

IOPS figures from the providers' documentation: Exoscale, Verda.

Cheapest server with 2 vCPU / 4 GB

  • Exoscale: Medium (2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, 10 GB disk) for €34.06/mo
  • Verda: CPU-TURIN.4V.16G (4 vCPU, 16 GB RAM) for €31.36/mo

Monthly list prices excl. VAT. More sizes in the instance finder.

We tested it

CH Exoscale
FI Verda
HQ / Country Switzerland Finland
Managed Kubernetes Yes No (DIY)
Control Plane Cost €40.15/mo Self-managed
Cheapest Node
€17.03/mo
2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM
€31.36/mo
4 vCPU, 16 GB RAM
3-Node Cluster* ~€91.24/mo ~€188.16/mo
6-Node HA Cluster* ~€142.33/mo ~€282.24/mo
Egress €0.020/GB Contact
S3 Storage €0.020/GB €0.070/GB
Certifications ISO27001, FINMA ISO27001, ISO27017, ISO27018, ISO27701, SOC2
CLOUD Act Exposure No No

* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.

Data freshness: Exoscale as of May 2026, Verda as of Nov 2026.

Calculate Your Exact Cost

Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 39+ European providers.

Open Calculator

Open Source Pricing Data

All pricing data is open source and community-maintained

View on GitHub