STACKIT vs Civo: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Civo is 41% cheaper than STACKIT for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€65 vs €110/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 41% (€45/mo) in Civo's favour. On storage throughput, STACKIT leads by ~48×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Control plane costs differ: Civo includes it free; STACKIT adds €74.63/mo. Choose Civo for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose STACKIT for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 STACKIT |  Civo | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Germany | United Kingdom |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | €74.63/mo | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €11.91/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €21.73/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€110.36/mo | ~€65.19/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€146.09/mo | ~€130.38/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.006/GB | €0.011/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, ISO27017, ISO27018, C5, SOC2 | ISO27001, SOC2 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: STACKIT as of May 2026, Civo as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator