netcup vs Gcore: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
netcup is 64% cheaper than Gcore for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€13 vs €37/mo)
netcup costs 64% less — a saving of ~€24/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. On storage throughput, netcup leads by ~11×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. On block storage, netcup is the cheaper option at roughly 1/7 the price per GB. Choose netcup for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Gcore for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 netcup |  Gcore | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Germany | Luxembourg |
| Managed Kubernetes | No (DIY) | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Self-managed | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €2.19/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €12.32/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€13.14/mo | ~€36.96/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€19.71/mo | ~€73.92/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | Not available | €0.040/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001 | ISO27001, SOC2, PCI-DSS |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: netcup as of May 2026, Gcore as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator