UpCloud vs Exoscale: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
UpCloud is 74% cheaper than Exoscale for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€24 vs €91/mo)
UpCloud costs 74% less — a saving of ~€67/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. Storage IOPS differ by ~20×, with UpCloud ahead — relevant if your workload relies on persistent volumes. UpCloud wins on network egress — unlimited egress vs paid. Choose UpCloud for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Exoscale for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 UpCloud |  Exoscale | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Finland | Switzerland |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €8.00/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €17.03/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€24.00/mo | ~€91.24/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€48.00/mo | ~€142.33/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | €0.020/GB |
| S3 Storage | €0.020/GB | €0.020/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001 | ISO27001, FINMA |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: UpCloud as of Jun 2026, Exoscale as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator