STACKIT vs Cyso: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Cyso is 25% cheaper than STACKIT for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€82 vs €110/mo)
Cyso costs 25% less — a saving of ~€28/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. For outbound traffic, STACKIT is more cost-effective: unlimited egress vs paid. On storage throughput, STACKIT leads by ~2×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Choose Cyso for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose STACKIT for lower egress costs at scale.
 STACKIT |  Cyso | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Germany | Netherlands |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | €74.63/mo | €29.99/mo |
| Cheapest Node | €11.91/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €17.50/mo 2 vCPU, 8 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€110.36/mo | ~€82.49/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€146.09/mo | ~€134.99/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | 4 TB free |
| S3 Storage | €0.006/GB | €0.055/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, ISO27017, ISO27018, C5, SOC2 | ISO27001 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: STACKIT as of May 2026, Cyso as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator