Contabo vs Civo: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Contabo is 59% cheaper than Civo for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€27 vs €65/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 59% (€38/mo) in Contabo's favour. On block storage, Contabo is the cheaper option at roughly 1/10.9 the price per GB. Contabo delivers ~7× the storage IOPS, which matters for write-heavy workloads like etcd or database operators. Choose Contabo for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Civo for Civo's specific capabilities.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Contabo |  Civo | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Germany | United Kingdom |
| Managed Kubernetes | No (DIY) | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Self-managed | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €4.50/mo 4 vCPU, 8 GB RAM | €21.73/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€27.00/mo | ~€65.19/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€40.50/mo | ~€130.38/mo |
| Egress | 32 TB free | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.010/GB | €0.011/GB |
| Certifications | None listed | ISO27001, SOC2 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Contabo as of Jan 2026, Civo as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator