STACKIT vs C1V Hosting: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
C1V Hosting is 67% cheaper than STACKIT for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€36 vs €110/mo)
C1V Hosting costs 67% less — a saving of ~€74/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. Egress is cheaper with STACKIT: unlimited egress vs paid. STACKIT offers a managed control plane; C1V Hosting requires self-managing the control plane, adding operational overhead but giving full configuration control. Choose C1V Hosting for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose STACKIT for lower egress costs at scale.
 STACKIT |  C1V Hosting | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Germany | Italy |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | No (DIY) |
| Control Plane Cost | €74.63/mo | Self-managed |
| Cheapest Node | €11.91/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM | €6.05/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€110.36/mo | ~€36.30/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€146.09/mo | ~€54.45/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | 20 TB free |
| S3 Storage | €0.006/GB | Not available |
| Certifications | ISO27001, ISO27017, ISO27018, C5, SOC2 | None listed |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: STACKIT as of May 2026, C1V Hosting as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator