Gcore vs C1V Hosting: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
C1V Hosting is 2% cheaper than Gcore for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€36 vs €37/mo)
C1V Hosting costs 2% less — a saving of ~€1/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. For outbound traffic, Gcore is more cost-effective: unlimited egress vs paid. Control plane management differs: Gcore is fully managed; C1V Hosting is self-operated. Choose C1V Hosting for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Gcore for lower egress costs at scale.
 Gcore |  C1V Hosting | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Luxembourg | Italy |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | No (DIY) |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Self-managed |
| Cheapest Node | €12.32/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €6.05/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€36.96/mo | ~€36.30/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€73.92/mo | ~€54.45/mo |
| Egress | Unlimited | 20 TB free |
| S3 Storage | €0.040/GB | Not available |
| Certifications | ISO27001, SOC2, PCI-DSS | None listed |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Gcore as of May 2026, C1V Hosting as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator