Infomaniak vs Gcore: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Infomaniak is 57% cheaper than Gcore for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€16 vs €37/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 57% (€21/mo) in Infomaniak's favour. On storage throughput, Gcore leads by ~9×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Gcore wins on network egress — unlimited egress vs paid. Choose Infomaniak for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Gcore for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Infomaniak |  Gcore | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Switzerland | Luxembourg |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €5.29/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €12.32/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€15.87/mo | ~€36.96/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€31.74/mo | ~€73.92/mo |
| Egress | 10 TB free | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.009/GB | €0.040/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, ISO14001 | ISO27001, SOC2, PCI-DSS |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Infomaniak as of May 2026, Gcore as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator