Skip to main content

Exoscale vs GCP (GKE): Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)

Exoscale is 45% cheaper than GCP (GKE) for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€91 vs €166/mo)

At the cluster level, Exoscale runs 45% cheaper, roughly €75/mo less than its competitor. GCP (GKE) delivers ~70× the storage IOPS, which matters for write-heavy workloads like etcd or database operators. For outbound traffic, Exoscale is more cost-effective: €0.020/GB vs €0.103/GB (5.2× cheaper). Choose Exoscale for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose GCP (GKE) for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.

Moving off GCP (GKE) could save ~€75/mo on a 3-node cluster.

Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →

Browse EU agencies
CH Exoscale
US GCP (GKE)
HQ / Country Switzerland United States
Managed Kubernetes Yes Yes
Control Plane Cost Free €73/mo
Cheapest Node
€17.03/mo
2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM
€34.37/mo
2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM
3-Node Cluster* ~€91.24/mo ~€165.95/mo
6-Node HA Cluster* ~€142.33/mo ~€269.06/mo
Egress €0.020/GB €0.103/GB
S3 Storage €0.020/GB €0.017/GB
Certifications ISO27001, FINMA ISO27001, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS
CLOUD Act Exposure No Yes (US-owned)

* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.

Data freshness: Exoscale as of May 2026, GCP (GKE) as of May 2026.

Calculate Your Exact Cost

Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.

Open Calculator

Open Source Pricing Data

All pricing data is open source and community-maintained

View on GitHub