Contabo vs STACKIT: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Contabo is 76% cheaper than STACKIT for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€27 vs €110/mo)
Contabo costs 76% less — a saving of ~€83/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. On storage throughput, STACKIT leads by ~7×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Contabo charges ~5× less for block storage per GB. Choose Contabo for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose STACKIT for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Need help picking the right EU Kubernetes provider or migrating your infrastructure?
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Germany | Germany |
| Managed Kubernetes | No (DIY) | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Self-managed | €74.63/mo |
| Cheapest Node | €4.50/mo 4 vCPU, 8 GB RAM | €11.91/mo 2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€27.00/mo | ~€110.36/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€40.50/mo | ~€146.09/mo |
| Egress | 32 TB free | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.010/GB | €0.006/GB |
| Certifications | None listed | ISO27001, ISO27017, ISO27018, C5, SOC2 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Contabo as of Jan 2026, STACKIT as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator