Cleura vs Safespring: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Safespring is 56% cheaper than Cleura for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€101 vs €233/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 56% (€131/mo) in Safespring's favour. Choose Safespring for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Cleura for Cleura's specific capabilities.
 Cleura | Safespring | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Sweden | Sweden |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €77.52/mo 4 vCPU, 8 GB RAM | €33.82/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€232.56/mo | ~€101.46/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€465.12/mo | ~€202.92/mo |
| Egress | €0.029/GB | Contact |
| S3 Storage | €0.020/GB | €0.044/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001 | ISO27001 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Cleura as of May 2026, Safespring as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator