Azure (AKS) vs Safespring: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Azure (AKS) is 29% cheaper than Safespring for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€72 vs €101/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 29% (€30/mo) in Azure (AKS)'s favour. Safespring is EU-headquartered and not subject to the CLOUD Act as a US-owned entity; Azure (AKS) is US-owned and falls under US jurisdiction. On block storage, Safespring is the cheaper option at roughly 1/1.4 the price per GB. Choose Azure (AKS) for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Safespring for full AWS ecosystem and global reach.
 Azure (AKS) |  Safespring | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | United States | Sweden |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €23.95/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €33.82/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€71.85/mo | ~€101.46/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€143.70/mo | ~€202.92/mo |
| Egress | €0.080/GB | Contact |
| S3 Storage | €0.018/GB | €0.044/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS | ISO27001 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | Yes (US-owned) | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Azure (AKS) as of May 2026, Safespring as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator