Azure (AKS) vs Hostinger: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Hostinger is 34% cheaper than Azure (AKS) for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€48 vs €72/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 34% (€24/mo) in Hostinger's favour. On storage throughput, Azure (AKS) leads by ~3×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Data sovereignty matters here: Hostinger is EU-based and not a CLOUD Act subject as a US-owned entity; Azure (AKS) operates under US law. Choose Hostinger for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Azure (AKS) for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
IOPS figures from the providers' documentation: Azure (AKS), Hostinger.
Cheapest server with 2 vCPU / 4 GB
- Azure (AKS): B2pls_v2 (2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM) for €24.07/mo
- Hostinger: KVM 2 (2 vCPU, 8 GB RAM, 100 GB disk) for €7.99/mo
Monthly list prices excl. VAT. More sizes in the instance finder.
Moving off Azure (AKS) could save ~€24/mo on a 3-node cluster.
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Azure (AKS) |  Hostinger | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | United States | Lithuania |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | No (DIY) |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Self-managed |
| Cheapest Node | €24.07/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €7.99/mo 2 vCPU, 8 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€72.21/mo | ~€47.94/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€144.42/mo | ~€71.91/mo |
| Egress | €0.080/GB | 4 TB free |
| S3 Storage | €0.018/GB | Not available |
| Certifications | ISO27001, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS | None listed |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | Yes (US-owned) | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Azure (AKS) as of Sept 2026, Hostinger as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 34+ European providers.
Open Calculator