Azure (AKS) vs Gcore: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Gcore is 49% cheaper than Azure (AKS) for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€37 vs €72/mo)
The 3-node cost gap is 49% (€35/mo) in Gcore's favour. Azure (AKS) delivers ~44× the storage IOPS, which matters for write-heavy workloads like etcd or database operators. Gcore wins on network egress — unlimited egress vs paid. Choose Gcore for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Azure (AKS) for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
Moving off Azure (AKS) could save ~€35/mo on a 3-node cluster.
Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →
 Azure (AKS) |  Gcore | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | United States | Luxembourg |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | Yes |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Free |
| Cheapest Node | €23.95/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €12.32/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€71.85/mo | ~€36.96/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€143.70/mo | ~€73.92/mo |
| Egress | €0.080/GB | Unlimited |
| S3 Storage | €0.018/GB | €0.040/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS | ISO27001, SOC2, PCI-DSS |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | Yes (US-owned) | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Azure (AKS) as of May 2026, Gcore as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator