Infomaniak vs Aruba Cloud: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Infomaniak is 58% cheaper than Aruba Cloud for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€16 vs €38/mo)
Infomaniak costs 58% less — a saving of ~€22/mo on a standard 3-node cluster. On storage throughput, Aruba Cloud leads by ~72×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. For outbound traffic, Infomaniak is more cost-effective: 10 TB free egress. Choose Infomaniak for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Aruba Cloud for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
 Infomaniak |  Aruba Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Switzerland | Italy |
| Managed Kubernetes | Yes | No (DIY) |
| Control Plane Cost | Free | Self-managed |
| Cheapest Node | €5.29/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM | €6.29/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€15.87/mo | ~€37.74/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€31.74/mo | ~€56.61/mo |
| Egress | 10 TB free | 2 TB free |
| S3 Storage | €0.009/GB | €0.030/GB |
| Certifications | ISO27001, ISO14001 | ISO27001, ISO9001 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Infomaniak as of May 2026, Aruba Cloud as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.
Open Calculator