Hostinger vs Aruba Cloud: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)
Aruba Cloud is 21% cheaper than Hostinger for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€38 vs €48/mo)
At the cluster level, Aruba Cloud runs 21% cheaper, roughly €10/mo less than its competitor. Storage IOPS differ by ~2×, with Hostinger ahead — relevant if your workload relies on persistent volumes. For outbound traffic, Hostinger is more cost-effective: 4 TB free egress. Choose Aruba Cloud for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Hostinger for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.
 Hostinger |  Aruba Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| HQ / Country | Lithuania | Italy |
| Managed Kubernetes | No (DIY) | No (DIY) |
| Control Plane Cost | Self-managed | Self-managed |
| Cheapest Node | €7.99/mo 2 vCPU, 8 GB RAM | €6.29/mo 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM |
| 3-Node Cluster* | ~€47.94/mo | ~€37.74/mo |
| 6-Node HA Cluster* | ~€71.91/mo | ~€56.61/mo |
| Egress | 4 TB free | 2 TB free |
| S3 Storage | Not available | €0.030/GB |
| Certifications | None listed | ISO27001, ISO9001 |
| CLOUD Act Exposure | No | No |
* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.
Data freshness: Hostinger as of May 2026, Aruba Cloud as of May 2026.
Calculate Your Exact Cost
Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 31+ European providers.
Open Calculator