Skip to main content

Azure (AKS) vs Aruba Cloud: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)

Aruba Cloud is 47% cheaper than Azure (AKS) for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€38 vs €72/mo)

The 3-node cost gap is 47% (€34/mo) in Aruba Cloud's favour. On storage throughput, Azure (AKS) leads by ~6×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Aruba Cloud is EU-headquartered and not subject to the CLOUD Act as a US-owned entity; Azure (AKS) is US-owned and falls under US jurisdiction. Choose Aruba Cloud for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose Azure (AKS) for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.

Moving off Azure (AKS) could save ~€34/mo on a 3-node cluster.

Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →

Browse EU agencies
US Azure (AKS)
IT Aruba Cloud
HQ / Country United States Italy
Managed Kubernetes Yes No (DIY)
Control Plane Cost Free Self-managed
Cheapest Node
€23.95/mo
2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM
€6.29/mo
2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM
3-Node Cluster* ~€71.85/mo ~€37.74/mo
6-Node HA Cluster* ~€143.70/mo ~€56.61/mo
Egress €0.080/GB 2 TB free
S3 Storage €0.018/GB €0.030/GB
Certifications ISO27001, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS ISO27001, ISO9001
CLOUD Act Exposure Yes (US-owned) No

* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.

Data freshness: Azure (AKS) as of May 2026, Aruba Cloud as of May 2026.

Calculate Your Exact Cost

Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.

Open Calculator

Open Source Pricing Data

All pricing data is open source and community-maintained

View on GitHub