Skip to main content

GCP (GKE) vs Hostinger: Kubernetes Cost Comparison (2026)

Hostinger is 71% cheaper than GCP (GKE) for a 3-node Kubernetes cluster (€48 vs €166/mo)

The 3-node cost gap is 71% (€118/mo) in Hostinger's favour. On storage throughput, GCP (GKE) leads by ~3×, a meaningful gap for stateful Kubernetes workloads. Data sovereignty matters here: Hostinger is EU-based and not a CLOUD Act subject as a US-owned entity; GCP (GKE) operates under US law. Choose Hostinger for cost-efficient Kubernetes on a budget; choose GCP (GKE) for IOPS-intensive stateful applications.

Moving off GCP (GKE) could save ~€118/mo on a 3-node cluster.

Get matched with a vetted EU migration agency →

Browse EU agencies
US GCP (GKE)
LT Hostinger
HQ / Country United States Lithuania
Managed Kubernetes Yes No (DIY)
Control Plane Cost €73/mo Self-managed
Cheapest Node
€34.37/mo
2 vCPU, 2 GB RAM
€7.99/mo
2 vCPU, 8 GB RAM
3-Node Cluster* ~€165.95/mo ~€47.94/mo
6-Node HA Cluster* ~€269.06/mo ~€71.91/mo
Egress €0.103/GB 4 TB free
S3 Storage €0.017/GB Not available
Certifications ISO27001, SOC2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS None listed
CLOUD Act Exposure Yes (US-owned) No

* Estimated using cheapest available node. DIY providers include 3 additional control plane nodes. Use the calculator for exact pricing with your specs.

Data freshness: GCP (GKE) as of May 2026, Hostinger as of May 2026.

Calculate Your Exact Cost

Configure your exact cluster specs and see real-time pricing across 33+ European providers.

Open Calculator

Open Source Pricing Data

All pricing data is open source and community-maintained

View on GitHub